From maintainers-request at octave dot org Thu Mar 23 11:50:31 2006 Subject: Re: Octave 2.1.73 available for ftp From: "John W. Eaton" To: Quentin Spencer Cc: octave bug mailing list , octave maintainers mailing list Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:50:28 -0500 On 23-Mar-2006, Quentin Spencer wrote: | John W. Eaton wrote: | | >On 23-Mar-2006, Quentin Spencer wrote: | > | >| Yes, I just found one: freqz is broken for FIR filters in 2.1.73. I | >| reported this earlier | >| (http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/bug-octave/2006/87), but I then | >| followed it up by noting that it had already been fixed in CVS. I | >| assumed that the changes had also been applied to the 2.1.x tree, but | >| apparently they haven't. I'm keeping the patch I had for this in the | >| Fedora release, so users of that package will not have this problem, but | >| it probably should be applied to CVS so that this will be fixed in the | >| next 2.1.x release if there is one. | | >Does the 2.9.x code work correctly with Octave 2.1.x? If you can | >confirm that, then I'll put the 2.9.x version in the 2.1.x tree. | | Yes. The patch I've had on the 2.1.72 release in Fedora basically | changed it to the 2.9.x version, and it works fine. [Oops, I should have copied my first reply to the lists.] I've copied the 2.9.x version to the 2.1.x sources. jwe