From maintainers-request at octave dot org Thu Jan 19 22:04:23 2006
Subject: Re: Depreciated Functions
From: Geordie McBain <geordie dot mcbain at aeromech dot usyd dot edu dot au>
To: Bill Denney <denney at seas dot upenn dot edu>
Cc: maintainers at octave dot org
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:02:42 +1100

Yes, but spell it `deprecated'.

On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:28 -0500, Bill Denney wrote:
> I'm thinking of adding a warning to all the depreciated functions of the 
> form
> 
> depfxn: depfxn is depreciated, please use newfxn instead.
> 
> Where depfxn is the depreciated function name and newfxn is the replacing 
> function name.  Would that be a fix that people want?
> 
> Bill
>