From maintainers-request at octave dot org Sat Feb 18 17:27:07 2006
Subject: Re: A MinGW release tomorrow?
From: "Sebastien Loisel" <sloisel at gmail dot com>
To: "Paul Kienzle" <pkienzle at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Cc: "octave maintainers mailing list" <maintainers at octave dot org>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:24:24 +0100

------=_Part_8902_27501927.1140305064308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 2/19/06, Paul Kienzle <pkienzle at users dot sf dot net> wrote:
>
> octave-forge is a perfectly reasonable place to host a mingw release.


David was telling me that Octave Forge is being phased out in favor of this
new system, so I'm not sure the timing for merging into Octave Forge is
right.

S=E9bastien Loisel

------=_Part_8902_27501927.1140305064308
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 2/19/06, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Paul Kienzle</b> &lt;<a href=3D"m=
ailto:pkienzle at users dot sf dot net">pkienzle@users dot sf dot net</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span=
 class=3D"gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"bo=
rder-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding=
-left: 1ex;">
octave-forge is a perfectly reasonable place to host a mingw release.</bloc=
kquote><div><br></div></div>David was telling me that Octave Forge is being=
 phased out in favor of this new system, so I'm not sure the timing for mer=
ging into Octave Forge is right.
<br><br>S=E9bastien Loisel<br><br>

------=_Part_8902_27501927.1140305064308--