From maintainers-request at octave dot org Fri Dec  9 03:43:39 2005
Subject: Re: message ids for warnings and errors
From: Stefan van der Walt <stefan at sun dot ac dot za>
To: Paul Kienzle <pkienzle at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Cc: octave maintainers mailing list <maintainers at octave dot org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:40:59 +0200

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:38:09PM -0500, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> The obvious way is to maintain a list of warning
> names and states for the current function context
> and run through this list when the function returns.
> This does mean the majority of functions have to
> pay for a feature they do not use, so not an ideal
> solution.

Would it be worthwhile to implement hash-tables in liboctave?  That
way the performance hit needs to be minimal.

Stefan