From maintainers-request at octave dot org Fri Dec  3 07:21:19 2004
Subject: Re: 2.1.64 snapshot soon?
From: "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu>
To: David Bateman <David dot Bateman at motorola dot com>
Cc: octave maintainers mailing list <maintainers at octave dot org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:22:01 -0500

On  3-Dec-2004, David Bateman <David dot Bateman at motorola dot com> wrote:

| Dapr=E8s John W. Eaton <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu> (le 03/12/2004):
| > I'm preparing to make a 2.1.64 snapshot that will be declared
| > "testing" or "recommended".  There haven't been too many bugs
| > reported, but at least one was fairly serious (the "end" indexing
| > problem for some data types).  I think most problems reported since=

| > the 2.1.63 snapshot was made have been fixed.  Is anyone aware of a=

| > problem that still needs to be addressed=3F
|=20
| I don't know of any. Though I can't even remember the end indexing bu=
g,
| was that the sscanf bug in
|=20
| http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/bug-octave/2004/861

No, it was this problem:

  http://www.octave.org/mailing-lists/octave-maintainers/2004/877

The sscanf problem was really an indexing problem, but at least it was
not a regression for valid input...

In any case, I think both have been fixed.

jwe