From maintainers-request at octave dot org Wed Nov 17 21:31:25 2004
Subject: Re: 2.1.62 breaks octave-forge (Re: Octave 2.1.62 available for ftp)
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian dot org>
To: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian dot org>
Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian dot org>,         David Bateman <David.Bateman@motorola.com>, maintainers@octave.org
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:24:34 -0600

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:41:41AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian dot org> [2004-11-16 11:57]:
> 
> > Go ahead, and add yourself in debian/control in a new Uploaders: field.
> > Welcome as a co-maintainer :)
>  
> * David Bateman <David dot Bateman at motorola dot com> [2004-11-16 20:25]:
> 
> > There are a few other things in the CVS relative to 2004.09.09, that might 
> > be of interest but aren't build issues. For example the op_uplus stuff is
> > needed for unary plus to work on the user types... But perhaps this isn't
> > importnat to finalize a release.
> 
> Actually, Paul Kienzle has just released a new version of octave-forge
> (2004-11-16).  Dirk: what should I do?  Should I package this version
> instead of the patched 2004-09-09?

I did this earlier, it is currently uploading:

octave-forge (2004.11.16-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Rebuilt with octave 2.1.63 			(Closes: #281777)
  * debian/control: Build-Depends and Depends updated accordingly
  * debian/control: Added Rafael as Uploaders:
	
 -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian dot org>  Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:51:39 -0600

I'll do the same with octave-sp aka semidef-oct.

Dirk

-- 
If your hair is standing up, then you are in extreme danger.
      -- http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfp/cockpit-phys/fp1ex3.htm