From octave-maintainers-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Thu Feb 20 21:47:41 2003 Subject: Re: Failure building CVS on IRIX 6.5 with GCC From: Paul Kienzle To: octave-maintainers at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:48:01 -0500 Albert Chin wrote: >On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 03:42:56PM -0600, John W. Eaton wrote: > > >>On 19-Feb-2003, Albert Chin wrote: >> >>| While building CVS on IRIX 6.5.19 with GCC 3.2.2. Any ideas? >> >>| g++ -c -I/opt/TWWfsw/readline42a/include -L/opt/TWWfsw/ncurses5/include -I/opt/TWWfsw/libfftw21/include -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc -I../glob -I../glob -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 syscalls.cc -o syscalls.o >>| syscalls.cc: In function `Octave_map mk_stat_map(const file_stat&)': >>| syscalls.cc:69: conversion from `ino_t' to `const octave_value' is ambiguous >> >>What is the actual type of ino_t on your system? >> >> > >typedef unsigned __uint32_t; >typedef __uint32_t o_ino_t; > FWIW, building octave 2.1.45 with Mips PRO C++ 7.30 gives the following result: octave:1> sprintf("%d is %d ", 1, 2) error: memory exhausted -- trying to return to prompt I think I would have noticed this in January when I was playing with 2.1.40. Anything changed since then which might affect sprintf? BTW, I've compiled most of octave-forge with CC as well, but it took some doing. Aside from the sprintf problem, all the oct-file tests succeeded. Symbolic, QHull and JPG were not included. Paul Kienzle pkienzle at users dot sf dot net