From octave-maintainers-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Fri Nov 21 13:14:54 2003
Subject: Re: accessing user-defined types from C++
From: Andy Adler <adler at site dot uottawa dot ca>
To: octave-maintainers at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu
cc: octave-maintainers mailing list <octave-maintainers at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:14:39 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, John W. Eaton wrote:
> That brings up another related topic.  Perhaps when we are building
> shared libraries, libcruft should be linked against all the libraries
> it depends on, and liboctave should be linked against libcruft and
> other direct dependencies, and liboctinterp agains liboctave and
> other direct dependencies, even on Linux systems?

I think this is a good idea. Since most development gets done on
linux, some undefined symbol errors can creep in, in the current
scenario, that make octave not build on systems that treat dynamic
linking differently. This change will make those bugs break the
linux build too.

Andy