From octave-maintainers-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Fri Nov 21 00:29:16 2003
Subject: Re: restructuring load-save
From: JD Cole <listguy at transientresearch dot com>
To: octave-maintainers at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:55:35 -0800

John W. Eaton wrote:

>On 20-Nov-2003, JD Cole <listguy at transientresearch dot com> wrote:
>
>| This brought to mind two issues (1) licensing, such a 
>| library should probably fall under a LGPL type license
>
>If it is derived from code currently in Octave, it will be distributed
>under the terms of the GPL.
>
>jwe
>  
>
I assumed as much, I guess my real point is that, such a library could 
be developed in parallel to Octave, but would it be more advantageous to 
develop this library out of the current discussion and then make Octave 
dependent upon it?

JD