From octave-maintainers-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Fri Oct 27 16:28:39 2000 Subject: flex version From: "John W. Eaton" To: "'octave-maintainers at octave dot org'" Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:28:34 -0500 On 27-Oct-2000, I wrote: | It would be better, but it was easier to just make the check in lex.l | using flex macros. Thinking about it a bit more, I'm not sure that it is worth writing a configure check for this if you are just going to check the version number, since what is really needed is a check to make sure that flex has the required feature(s) or doesn't have the bug(s) that prompted me to require 2.5.4. Unfortunately, I don't have a record of that, only the following lame-o ChangeLog entry, which doesn't help much. Fri Feb 21 15:35:18 1997 John W. Eaton * lex.l: Require flex 2.5 or later (we really want 2.5.4 or later, but there seems to be no good way to check the patchlevel). jwe