From graphics-request at octave dot org Wed Jun  9 10:40:26 2004
Subject: Re: Visualisation applications and Octave.
From: Daniel J Sebald <daniel dot sebald at ieee dot org>
To: graphics at octave dot org
Cc: maintainers at octave dot org, graphics@octave.org
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:02:50 -0500



Teemu Ikonen wrote:

>On 08/06/04 23:13, Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:
>  
>
>>We are still using oset, oget, oplot, oline, osurf,oimage,opatch and so 
>>on, but we would really want to use set, get, plot, line, surf, patch 
>>instead.
>>This would mean that m-files to the application, which we cannot mention 
>>here can also be used within Octave.
>>So, John...Is it possible to remove the builtin set-command?
>>    
>>
>
>Hi,
>
>A few months ago I posted a patch to the maintainers list which allows for
>removing all the gnuplot-related code from core Octave, while the interface
>remains at least 90% compatible. I promised John to work on the patch a
>little more (I had some strange bugs with gnuplot 4.0), but haven't had the
>time and interest lately.
>

Teemu,

What kind of strangeness are you experiencing in 4.0?  I've not run 4.0 
from any of the binaries, but the CVS version seems to run fine with 4.0.

Dan