From help-request at octave dot org Fri Oct 7 19:09:38 2005 Subject: Re: octave to matlab conversion From: Ben Barrowes To: z dot hurak at c-a-k dot cz Cc: help at octave dot org Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 20:08:12 -0400 I support octave. Additionally, I think that it is very worthwhile to aim for compatibility with ML. ML survives (and thrives) because it posesses advantages and capabilities over other languages that makes it a great environment to prototype, develope, design, and compute. While it is pricey, its advantages continue to be sufficient to justify the cost for many users. Octave has gained notoriety and a ready made user base due to its aim to be compatible with ML. At the same time, octave is not bound to be _only_ a ML compatible environment and does innovate in many ways beyond what ML provides. Abandoning ML compatibility is not something I would recommend. bb Zdenek Hurak wrote: >I would like to express my support to John and others in that Octave is not >to be regarded as a Matlab clone! > >Well, it is quite obvious that this compatibility with >Matlab has earned quite a lot of users to Octave software, on the other >hand, the whole project should evolve in its own direction now. > >Otherwise, Octave will always be the second (or even worse), never being the >one who brings innovation. Just the one who takes ideas from others... (I >even find it a bit unfair to Matlab producers). A toy for students. > >But this would be a pitty since I believe that Octave is perfectly prepared >to be a versatile tool for innovation in scientific computing. > >Scilab project has abandoned these requirements on compatibility with Matlab >and I don't think it has brought any harm to them. They are free in their >development of the whole system. > >Best regards from Prague, >Zdenek Hurak > > > > > >Ben Barrowes wrote: > > > >>Does anyone have a handy piece of code to convert octave-style m-files to >>matlab-style m-files? >> >>This is becoming relevant as octave's source is many times used in a >>matlab setting when one does not want to buy ML toolboxes, case in point, >>the statistics or signal processing toolboxes. Or at times when >>octave-style source is better/more available than the corresponding ML >>source. >> >> >[...] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------