From help-request at octave dot org Fri May 27 09:34:55 2005 Subject: AW: octave 2.1.50 versus 2.1.71 From: "Martin Ranftler" To: "'John W. Eaton'" Cc: Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:34:05 +0200 Hi ladies and gentlemen. I've installed the version 2.1.71 (which is marked as "Testing"). I copy the .m-files to the directory "scripts" (making a subdirectory) I learn: To copy is not all - what must I do?=20 After a new "make install" they run, but I think this is not the right procedure.. Even when the script runs (after make install), gnuplot does not start (like it does in 2.1.50) Thank you, best regards mr -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: John W. Eaton [mailto:jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu]=20 Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Mai 2005 16:17 An: Martin Ranftler Cc: help at octave dot org Betreff: octave 2.1.50 versus 2.1.71 On 27-May-2005, Martin Ranftler wrote: | Now, after reading all comments in this forum I have installed cygwin = and | octave 2.1.71 in addition. |=20 | But.=20 |=20 | How can I bring my scripts to run? |=20 | How can I get the same functionality for gnuplot which I have at = 2.1.50 ? If you describe precisely what doesn't work for you, then someone will probably help you. But without that information, there's not much anyone can do to answer this question. | Shall I propose to install 2.1.50? Here I have an easy installation = file.? |=20 | I can propose cygwin and 2.1.71, but with the scripts I have a = problem. 2.1.50 is quite old. I would recommend using the version marked as "testing" at http://www.octave.org/download.html. jwe ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------