From help-octave-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Wed Dec 13 15:49:22 2000 Subject: Re: some thoughts about the future of Octave From: A S Hodel To: help-octave at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu CC: Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 15:48:44 -0600 > on 12/13/00 3:31 PM, John A. Turner at turner at blueskystudios dot com wrote: >>>>>> "JC" == Cardoso : > > JC> John Eaton has always been concerned with both the code "quality" and > JC> the code correcteness. In my opinion, this approach has keep away from > JC> Octave many potential developers. > > I'm not sure what you mean by this, but I would hope that any potential > developers *not* concerned with code quality and correctness *continue* to > stay away from the project I agree. Some level of peer review for code submissions to Octave needs to be upheld. To date, that peer review has been jwe first, other users later. I've been embarassed by some lousy code here and there that I've written, and wouldn't want checks on code submission to be lost. -- A S Hodel Assoc. Prof. Dept Elec. Comp. Eng. Auburn Univ, AL 36849-5201 (334) 844-1854 Fax -1809 http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~scotte ------------------------------------------------------------- Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL. Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html -------------------------------------------------------------