From help-octave-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu  Tue Jan 12 10:19:00 1999
Subject: Re: Re.fixed, new problem: compile error on SGI using egcs 1.1.b
From: Daniel Heiserer <Daniel dot Heiserer at bmw dot de>
To: "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu>,         "help-octave@bevo.che.wisc.edu" <help-octave@bevo.che.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:18:16 +0100

John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> On 12-Jan-1999, Daniel Heiserer <Daniel dot Heiserer at bmw dot de> wrote:
> 
> | > >I have a problem compiling octave-2.0.13
> | > >using "> c++ --version
> | > >egcs-2.91.57"
> | > >(egcs.1.1b)
> | > >The machine I am on is a "IRIX64 6.4"
> | > >The error is:
> | > >
> | > >c++ -c  -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc
> | > >-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fno-implicit-templates -g -O2
> | > >-Wall data.cc
> | > >In file included from ov.h:43,
> | > >                 from variables.h:38,
> | > >                 from defun-int.h:26,
> | > >                 from defun.h:30,
> | > >                 from data.cc:43:
> | > >pt-exp.h:257: default argument missing for parameter 3 of
> | > >`tree_boolean_expression::tree_boolean_expression(int = -1, int = -1,
> | > >enum tree_boolean_expression::type)'
> | > >gmake[2]: *** [data.o] Error 1
> | > >
> |
> | Hi again,
> | Well I applied ALL the patches from 0-90 and 90...-95
> 
> Were they successfully applied?

How can I see that?

> 
> | The compilation went on and I got a step further.
> | Now I have a new problem:
> | c++ -c  -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc
> | -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -fno-implicit-templates -g -O2
> | -Wall lo-specfun.cc
> | lo-specfun.cc: In function `int ribesl_(const double &, const double &,
> | const int &, double *, int &)':
> | lo-specfun.cc:162: warning: passing `int' to argument 4 of
> | `ribesl_(const double &, const double &, const int &, double *, int &)'
> | lacks a cast
> 
> Hmm.  If the patches were all successful, you shouldn't have any
> references to ribesl anywhere in the sources now.  Are you sure you
> applied the patch files correctly?  You should have run commands like
> 
>   zcat octave-2.0.13-2.0.13.90.patch.gz | /bin/sh
>   zcat octave-2.0.13.90-2.0.13.91.patch.gz | /bin/sh
>   zcat octave-2.0.13.91-2.0.13.92.patch.gz | /bin/sh
>   zcat octave-2.0.13.92-2.0.13.93.patch.gz | /bin/sh
>   zcat octave-2.0.13.93-2.0.13.94.patch.gz | /bin/sh
>   zcat octave-2.0.13.94-2.0.13.95.patch.gz | /bin/sh
> 
Well I ran (after doing a gunzip on all of them):

sh octave-2.0.13-2.0.13.90.patch 
sh octave-2.0.13.90-2.0.13.91.patch 
sh octave-2.0.13.91-2.0.13.92.patch 
sh octave-2.0.13.92-2.0.13.93.patch 
sh octave-2.0.13.93-2.0.13.94.patch 
sh octave-2.0.13.94-2.0.13.95.patch 

Bye