From help-octave-request at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu Fri May 15 04:16:41 1998 Subject: Re: text command in octave ?? From: "PETER HOPFGARTNER" To: Date: Fri, 15 May 98 11:06:48 +0100 I've got the impression that the numerical topics covered freely avaiable don't have that momentum that the kernel development has mostly because it is too spreaded. You have (at least as long as the HURD has that stability and driver support that the Linux kernel has) ONE kernel to work on, ONE compiler kit (if you consider egcs an prototype for GCC 3), ONE glib etc. But you have more then one member of the Matlab-like family (Octave SURELY the best (biased opinion), Scilab, Euler, etc). You have the calculation libraries SPREAD over liboctave, which is mostly a wrapper for extremly well tested Fortran routines, a lot of useful routines in gnussl (linear algebra), a lot in gsl (random numbers, fft, annealing), in plotutils (splines, ode). That leaves me confused. PDE is appraoched from a technog, KFEM etc. Plotting is done by GNUPLOT, PLOTUTILS, PLPLOT and more. I think, that contributions come when a project starts to have that mixture of importance, sex-appeal, visions and most of all syncronization, like the Linux kernel has, like the gnome project has etc. Could it be that this could be done starting project in the spirit of the IMSL, based obviously on C++, basing Octave and all the plotting, statistics etc. on it. I think that this could gain the attention from the numerical hacker community. Peter ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: text command in octave ?? Author: at NOVARALINK Date: 5/15/98 1:36 AM (...) Consider writing one and contributing it! | REMARK: Octave is a GREAT and USEFUL program. Thanks. I think it would be more useful if more people would contribute more. If only a small fraction of the people interested in hacking on the Linux kernel were instead interested in working on improving Octave, it might have a lot more features. (...)