From help-octave-request at che dot utexas dot edu Sat Jul 16 21:50:17 1994 Subject: add me to list; general comments; dld? From: HORNE at CMOD2 dot PFC dot MIT dot EDU To: help-octave at che dot utexas dot edu Date: Sat, 16 Jul 1994 22:50:13 -0400 (EDT) 1) It's not clear exactly how to get on this mailing list; please add me, or let me know how to become a member. 2) I have used a competitor of Matlab (IDL) very extensively over the last 10 years or so. Octave seems to be the most useful "free" alternative. ("Free" in the FSF sense.) I'd appreciate an explanation on the legal issues surrounding octave/Matlab. 3) The single most useful function any system like octave can have, is dynamic loading of user compiled fortran or C functions. I have more or less built a career on connecting codes from netlib (TOMS, particularly) into IDL. I work primarily on DEC machines under VMS, which supports what DEC calls "shareable images". I don't know much about Unix (I'm learning; running Linux on 486 at home) but the DLD package seems roughly equivalent. I see notes in the documentation refering to DLD, but my impression is that the idea is to make all (or at least very many) modules loadable, and that this is still a distant hope. A more modest goal which will add a huge amount of functionality is described below. 4) Is anyone working on an octave routine to do the following: ("filename" is a library or .o file) a) Take arguments of (filename, entry_point, arg_1, arg_2,...) b) use DLD to load into memory the code (in filename) associated with entry_point c) call entry_point with arguments arg_1, arg_2,... , passing them by reference so as to maximize convenience for fortran. An important point-- the octave routine (call it call_fortran) need not make any assumptions or be clever. It should not, for instance, try to determine array sizes automagically. It should be dead dumb. A wrapper routine (in octave) can interface between any given routine, and call_fortran. As a specific example, I include below the IDL code I wrote years ago to call the IMSL routine LSVRR from IDL. The equivalent to call_fortran was the routine DOIT, which I wrote in fortran and linked into IDL. (If you're familiar with IDL, the functionality of my DOIT has since been incorporated into IDL as "CALL_EXTERNAL". 'imsl' is the VMS shareable image containing most of the IMSL library.) ============ pro lsvrr,a,s,u,v,tol,rank ; ; S. Horne ; Return singular value decomposition of A ; Call l2vrr from imsl v10. See that documentation. ; Remember, all integer arguments to DOIT or ICF must be longwords (32 bits) ; See aml$root:[idl]doit.txt ; Should check for complex array and call appropriate routine, but doesn't. ; ; Modified to return rank estimate 8/21/90 -- smw np=n_params(0) ; get number of arguments. if (np lt 4) then begin ; not enough args print,'Not enough arguments to IMSL routine L2VRR' return endif if (np eq 4) then tol=0. ; Default tol. ; Correct no of args. q=size(a) if (q(0) ne 2) then begin print,'Array must be 2 dimensional, not',q(0),'dimensional.' return endif ; Correct dimensions, let's go. zero=long(0) one=long(1) doit,'imsl','erset', zero,one,zero ; Print errors, but don't stop. nra=q(1) ; get dimensions of a nca=q(2) at=float(a) ; array must be real*4 lda=nra ipath=long(11) irank=long(0) ; rank. s=fltarr(min( [nra+1,nca ])) ; singular values. ;ncu=min( [nra,nca] ) ncu=nra u=fltarr(nra,ncu) ldu=nra v=fltarr(nca,nca) ldv=nca ; now compute the workspace arrays. acopy=at wk=fltarr(nra*nca+nra+nca+max( [nra,nca] )-1) ; CALL THE ROUTINE doit,'imsl','l2vrr',nra,nca,at,lda,ipath,tol,irank,s,u,ldu,v,ldv,acopy,wk if np lt 6 then print,'rank=',irank else rank=irank doit,'imsl','erset', zero,long(2),long(2) ; Print errors, but don't stop. return end ================== There are many calculations the guts of which are better coded in fortran than a higher level language; I've found the ability to write subroutines in fortran, but to call the routines from a higher level language (IDL, in my case; hopefully octave) to do all I/O and post-processing a tremendous win. (My record is about 30 minutes from "I'd like to solve these equations in L1 norm instead of least squares" to looking at the solution. This involved finding the appropriate routiine at netlib, pulling it in, compiling & linking as shareable image, writing 10-line IDL wrapper routine.) I plan to devote some effort to adding this kind of functionality to octave. If anybody else is working in this general direction, please email me. 5) Is anybody working on a VMS version of octave? I don't know how competent I would be to assist, but I'd certainly be interested. Finally, thanks to everyone who supports this system. It has tremendous potential. I've been long-winded; sorry if I'm preaching to the choir. horne at cmod dot mit dot edu