From bug-request at octave dot org Sat Jul  9 13:09:58 2005
Subject: Re: statistics distributions function names
From: Tom Holroyd <holroydt at mail dot nih dot gov>
To: Ben Barrowes <barrowes at alum dot mit dot edu>
cc: "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo dot che dot wisc dot edu>, bug@octave.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 14:08:48 -0400 (EDT)

> I'm not sure it is an issue of being "broken" or not, just convention.

Oh, I thought you said the Weibull (sp?) routines in ML were 
somehow different from the mathematically correct definition.

Still, if the names are different, wrapper functions are good.

Dr. Tom Holroyd
"A man of genius makes no mistakes. His errors are volitional and
are the portals of discovery." -- James Joyce



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------